Latest Blog Posts
You sign up for a project management tool for $10/month. Three years later, you have 400GB of data, complex automations, and 50 employees trained on it. The vendor raises the price to $18/month, then $29/month, then introduces a "per-seat-per-API-call" fee. They know you cannot leave. The software doesn't need to be good anymore. It just needs to be migratable enough to make switching cost $40,000 in labor. That isn't a software company; that is a ransomware operation with a .com domain.
It maintains strict boundaries between components to prevent cascading failures. Academic and Professional Context While most commonly discussed in the context of the Release It!
You write a unit test not to prove the code works, but to prove you didn't break it. You add a log statement not to debug, but to cover your ass when the on-call page goes off at 3 AM. You reject a pull request not because the logic is flawed, but because the style guide says you must use double quotes, and the author used single quotes.
: A classic "cynical" pattern. If a remote service starts failing or slowing down, the circuit breaker trips, immediately failing subsequent requests to prevent the entire system from hanging while waiting for a response that isn't coming.
: A blog and podcast exploring the art of saying no to feature bloat and managing tech debt.
How did we get here? The story of cynical software is the story of the internet growing up—and becoming terrified.
Cynical software is the result of a "growth at all costs" mentality. When a line on a chart becomes more important than the person using the keyboard, the software inevitably turns predatory. As users, our power lies in our "exit intent." By supporting developers who respect our agency and opting out of extractive platforms, we can demand a future where software is a tool once again, not a trap.
